themousecried

WARNING-WARNING-WARNING-WARNING-WARNING-WARNING-WARNING The mouse cried because of the snake,and the snake came to see the mouse,horror,chills,thrills,not for the faint of heart or those with headaches,upset stomach,uncut fingernails,room unclean, etc..., THEY'RE BACK AND THEY ARE REALLY MEAN VILE CREATURES OF TERROR.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL - EXPOSED!

THE PRANKSTER DID MORE THAN PRANK MR. WATSON, HE ALSO PRANKED A GENERATION AND A NATION. EVER WONDER HOW MUCH OF HISTORY IS TRUE? IT ONLY ILLUSTRATES THE NEED FOR "THE MOUSE CRIED" ( a "PAGE ONE" production ) YOUR ONE SOURCE OF NEWS.
Book argues that Bell stole phone idea
2 Hours, 10 minutes ago
A new book claims to have definitive evidence of a long-suspected technological crime — that Alexander Graham Bell stole ideas for the telephone from a rival, Elisha Gray. In "The Telephone Gambit: Chasing Alexander Graham Bell's Secret," journalist Seth Shulman argues that Bell — aided by aggressive lawyers and a corrupt patent examiner — got an improper peek at patent documents Gray had filed, and that Bell was erroneously credited with filing first. Shulman believes the smoking gun is Bell's lab notebook, which was restricted by Bell's family until 1976, then digitized and made widely available in 1999. The notebook details the false starts Bell encountered as he and assistant Thomas Watson tried transmitting sound electromagnetically over a wire. Then, after a 12-day gap in 1876 — when Bell went to Washington to sort out patent questions about his work — he suddenly began trying another kind of voice transmitter. That method was the one that proved successful. As Bell described that new approach, he sketched a diagram of a person speaking into a device. Gray's patent documents, which describe a similar technique, also feature a very similar diagram. Shulman's book, due out Jan. 7, recounts other elements that have piqued researchers' suspicions. For instance, Bell's transmitter design appears hastily written in the margin of his patent; Bell was nervous about demonstrating his device with Gray present; Bell resisted testifying in an 1878 lawsuit probing this question; and Bell, as if ashamed, quickly distanced himself from the telephone monopoly bearing his name. Perhaps the most instructive lesson comes when Shulman explores why historical memory has favored Bell and not Gray — nor German inventor Philipp Reis, who beat them both with 1860s telephones that employed a different principle. One reason is simply that Bell, not Gray, actually demonstrated a phone that transmitted speech. Gray was focused instead on his era's pressing communications challenge: how to send multiple messages simultaneously over the same telegraph wire. As Gray huffed to his attorney, "I should like to see Bell do that with his apparatus."

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY REPORT

UNITED NATIONS
A REPORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
The United States of America has been gracious enough to fund what seemed an impossible task but now has been resolved and our report to the General Assembly is as follows: 1. There needs to not be any future apprehension or fear of a crime at-large or a miscarriage of justice assumed. 2. In an accountability of funding, the USA has retained, in the form of grant monies, a quarter of a billion dollars for research to prove once and for all and to put to an end any rumour-mongering concerning that of Alexander Graham Bell and his accomplice Thomas Watson based upon the invention of the telephony concerning the early years of 1917 and the years following to include our current year of our LORD 2007-8. 3. We the General Investigative Body or GIB have determined concerning the fault of such rumour-mongering may now be laid to the feet (so to speak) or to the charge of youths worldwide for all the clamour and disruption worldwide which has amounted to many sleepless nights for parents and governments everywhere. The cost although enourmous of 250 million dollars, shows our concern and resolve to clear up all these areas so that the nations may get back to business and not spend more sleepless nights in anticipation and anxiety and hopeful the psycholgists may return from counseling toward what has now been determined to be nothing more than that of the youth of the world playing pranks on all of us, including the psycholgists whom have spent much time and effort to quell all the anxiety ridden parents and dignitaries worldwide including that of Kings,Queens,Princes and Princesses. Herein, is the truth of the matter:
As early as 1917, Alexander G. Bell played what was determined through our research to be quite the prankster (which has led the youth since to perform, "copycat" of his pranks) as he inquired of Watson in that famous phone call, "Watson, my good fella, have you got Prince Albert in a can?" Knowing that Bell was an avid pipesmoker, the unbeknowing Watson replied to his shagrin, "Yes, I do Alex, might I bring it over?" "No, My dear Watson, Just let him out before he suffocates." As you might realize today's children are calling stores,pantries,grocers and the like and asking "Have you got Prince Albert in a can?", When the unsuspecting proprietors answer, "Yes", the youth state, "Better let him out before he suffocates", some of the youth make a mistake and state, "before he dies".
AS OF THIS REPORT YOU THE KINGS AND DIGNITARIES AND PARENTS MAY END YOUR STATE OF ANXIETY AS WELL AS WE, THERE IS NO REAL PERSON NAMED PRINCE ALBERT OR ANY OTHER PERSON CONTAINED IN A CAN, IT IS MERELY AND ONLY THE NAME OF A TOBACCO BEARING THE TITLE, PRINCE ALBERT. WE REALIZE IT WILL TAKE A WHILE FOR ALL THE PEOPLES OF THE WORLD TO FULLY REALIZE THIS REPORT AND THAT IS WHY WE NEED YOU TO TELL ONE THAT THEY MAY TELL ONE. AS SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON ONCE STATED, "IT TAKES A VILLAGE" AND INDEED IT DOES.

Labels: